She described former President Saleh as deposed for the first time, even though she was keen to keep him in power and defeat the revolution of change that rose against him. When the Kingdom was unable to contain the revolution, it resorted to a trick called the Gulf Initiative, which kept him and his party with half the power before all the cards were later scattered.< /p>

 - The newspaper said that Saleh conspired with the Houthis to overthrow the settlement that took place in accordance with the Gulf initiative, and that he facilitated their entry into Sanaa. Meanwhile, the channel did not mention at all the silent, suspicious Saudi role when the Houthis were gnawing away at the geography, one unit after another, towards Sanaa, while Riyadh maintained a tasteful silence. Satisfaction with what was happening.

    -Several phrases included in the report approved of the revolution of change indirectly and in a way that is closer to quibbling and spite than to fairness and professionalism, which is a position that contradicts its previous opposing position to those revolutions, which it continued to describe as a satanic Brotherhood act that threatens the region.

- The channel hinted at Saleh’s partnership in the crime of assassinating President Al-Hamdi, but it ignored the other local and Saudi partners, the first of whom is the Saudi military attaché in Sana’a Al-Hadyan, and avoided going into details.

 - She said that he conspired against unity and the far south and marginalized it, and after that his dictatorship, corruption, and selfishness prevailed during his reign. We agree with most of what was stated on this point, even though the Kingdom remained silent and agreed with him regarding the south as soon as he concluded the border demarcation treaty with it in 2000 AD.

 - The channel said that he blackmailed the Gulf and America in the name of the Houthis and Al-Qaeda to bring in money. The channel, or rather the Kingdom, is honest in this, even though it is an admission that the Kingdom is easy to blackmail or is complicit with it for other purposes.

     -In 2009 AD, during the recent war in Saada, the channel said that Saleh was giving false coordinates to Saudi aircraft, so instead of the sites to be struck being Houthi, they were sites belonging to the northwestern region belonging to Ali Mohsen al-Ahmar. An explicit Saudi admission of participation in those wars and an explicit accusation of Saleh of betraying the army in that war.

 The channel deliberately neglected mentioning the role of Ali Mohsen Al-Ahmar, especially the bloody incidents and events. Riyadh does not want to lose the Islah Party at this stage. Although Mohsen was the strongest man in power and the most influential, the channel completely ignored his role..

 The channel indicated in its first manner of estrangement with the General People’s Congress, saying that its tribe, Hashid, had failed. The channel highlighted a sharp speech by the late Sheikh Sadiq al-Ahmar in which he harshly attacked Saleh and his sons. 

 Finally: Why did Saudi Arabia open such dangerous files now? Perhaps the matter is related to the relationship of Tariq Saleh and the Congress Party abroad, which maintains a close relationship with the UAE, the undeclared opponent of Saudi Arabia. That is, the message may be the UAE and Tariq together.

   Salah Al-Saqladi