The specialized criminal court in Hadramout issued a number of criminal rulings at its public session headed by Judge Fahd Al Yazidi, President of the Court, and in the presence of a member of the prosecutor Judge Sabri Al -Awaini and in the presence of Secretary Salem Bawazir in the Grand Criminal Case No. (98) for the year 1445 AH from the Criminal Public Prosecution regarding the charge of kidnapping a means of transportation and intentional murder.

It came up with its operative followers:

First: The accused of the accused defendants (Khaled Hassan Abdullah Qureshi) and the accused (Misfer Omar Ibrahim Harbi) and the accused (Saqqa Ibrahim Ibrahim Harbi and the accused (Ali Abdullah Sagheer Mufleh) and the accused (Yasser Abdul Ghafour John) and the accused (Abdo John) and the accused (Omar Brash) with what is attributed to them in the accusation decision.

Second: Punishment of those convicted of execution by firing shot to death.

Third: Downloading those convicted of solidarity, expenses and losers of litigation for an amount of seven million Yemeni riyals for the victims, the heirs of the victim (Muhammad Saleh Khamis Karbashat).

Fourth: The confiscation of the seizures made pending the case.

The court also issued its elementary ruling in the criminal case No. (65) of 1446 AH regarding the charge of participating in an armed gang, which spent spoken, accordingly:

First: The conviction of the accused (ASAA) with what is attributed to him in the accusation decision according to the amendment to the reasons.

Second: Suffice the period spent by the convict in pretrial detention.

Third: Preventing the convict from moving outside the city of Mukalla for a period of two years starting from the date of pronouncing the ruling, while obliging him to provide a pledge not to violate this and to security and commitment to good conduct and behavior and to provide his guarantee of two capables to pay an amount of three million Yemeni riyals according to what was made in the reasons.

The court also issued its primary ruling in the criminal case No. (12) for the year 1445 AH on the charge of insulting a judge, who spent spoken of the following:

First of all condemning the accused (FAA) with what is attributed to him in the accusation decision according to the amendment to the reasons.

Second: Punishment of the convict for the total of the two crimes by paying a fine of a sum of money and its amount and forty thousand Yemeni riyals.

Third: Accepting the lawsuit with the personal right in form and on the subject of what is the following:

a) Obliging the defendant, convicted of compensation for the victim (EAA) for the moral damages he suffered with a cash amount of five million Yemeni riyals.