In most armed conflicts, the “truth” is usually absent. Rather, it is the first and largest victim of wars and major crises, but the “truth” remains the most important absentee in the midst of all propaganda and psychological wars, since the time of “Goebbels”, the Minister of Information “Hitler”, through “Ahmed Saeed” in Nasiriyah Egypt or “Muhammad Saeed Al -Sahaf” in the Iraq of Saddam Hussein, and others, and not the end of the one who has been replaced today. Another type of publicity ministers; Like the "official spokesman" in the name of this party or that group, or "strategic expert", who is dead for his mission with graphics maps, and multi -dimensional imaging techniques.

The farce of construction data, or the military and political analyzes that are evident in some of our Arab satellite channels at the hands of these “speakers and experts” seem to be an authentic part of the absurdity of wars taking place today in some regions of the Middle East, especially in the Arab region.

We see on the screens today, many people who are being presented with their high military ranks, or their previous leadership qualities in the armies of their countries.

There is nothing wrong with that, but most of them speak as if he had already fought wars, and led fierce field battles, while he may not have participated in any military confrontation with an external enemy, or even in a mere maneuver, or training in the fighting, but rather that some of them only lies in that he led internal suppression operations in his country against a protest here or a limited rebellion there.

The strangest thing is that some of the likes of these - when they talk about the wars of the region - provide misleading information, using impressive visual techniques in preparation and directing.

There is nothing wrong even that some of those hosted by some of these channels are former military leaders.

The problem also lies in that the slightest conditions for military or political analysis, which is assumed by a methodology and scientific neutrality, is not available to some of these, as the agenda of the entity to which the host channel belongs is often adopted in exchange for a little money.

We do not see at the natural disasters and humanitarian crises in the presence of analysts and experts rich in research, information and details, as we see them when they multiply whenever there is an armed conflict or a political crisis between parties that have the ability to fund to find in these people who promote this or that party without knowledge or knowledge sufficient for the backgrounds of the issues they are talking about.

wrote the Kuwaiti thinker d. Muhammad Al -Rumaihi, on October 27, 2018, in the Saudi newspaper "Al -Sharq Al -Awsat", issued by London in Issue No. [14578], a deep and complicated article on what he lived near during a visit to the American capital, Washington.

One of those who met Al -Ramyhi gave herself to him as a specialist in Gulf affairs, so he came in his article, “I said I shake hands with her: Maybe here in this capital there are specialists in Gulf affairs more than the Gulf people themselves!

Today, there has been a new innovation for some satellite channels when he presented someone not as an expert, analyst or researcher, but on the basis that he is a "advisor" of the affairs of the region, or the relationship between this state and that, as if these satellite channels became a supreme party in the country that finances it competing with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and not just a media outlet.

All of this affects the viewer’s mind with damage, and works to disregard and falsify his awareness, and confuse his understanding of the facts of things, or events and their developments, as they are in reality, and not as it appears in the imagination of this “strategic analyst” or that.