Officially, the United Nations, through its envoy to Yemen, announces today the agreement of all parties on a road map that will be sponsored by the United Nations and will include the parties’ commitment to implementing the ceasefire, paying all public sector salaries, resuming oil exports, opening roads in Taiz and other parts of Yemen, and continuing... Easing restrictions imposed on Sanaa Airport and Hodeidah Port.

Also, according to the UN envoy, this map will establish implementation mechanisms and prepare for a political process led by Yemenis under the auspices of the United Nations. Finished.

 *Questions*:

- 1- Who exactly are these Yemeni parties that the UN envoy spoke about and which he said had agreed during the past months on this map? Is the southern side present among them? ..Even though we know that the rounds of dialogues that took place in Muscat, Riyadh, and Sanaa took place between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis directly and in isolation from the participation of any other party, including the Presidential Council that Riyadh established specifically for this mission (the mission of negotiating with the Houthis), in addition to the absence of the southern party?

-2- What does it mean when he (the envoy) said that the next political process will be under international auspices without any reference to the role of the Gulf and Saudi Arabia specifically in the coming days? Has Saudi Arabia succeeded in presenting itself as a mediator, not as a main partner in the war, with the approval of the United Nations, whose envoy said that he thanks the Kingdom and the Sultanate of Oman for their role in mediation and rapprochement between the conflicting Yemeni parties? Did the Saudi influence have a magical effect in its influence on the world, to the extent that it made the representative of the nations lie out loud day and night while claiming that the negotiations in the previous months were between President Al-Alimi and Muhammad Abdel Salam? If it succeeded in evading being a major partner in the war, it would be able to escape its financial obligations. And the morality towards the repercussions and consequences of this war?*

-3- *What does it mean for the South if the coalition abandons playing the role of an active partner in the war or even a sponsor of the next settlement? Is this Gulf trend of throwing the file in the hands of the United Nations a stab in the southern back for Najla and leaving him uncovered between the claws of lions and hyenas as a punishment for a samanar? Or did the southerners foolishly let themselves down and blindly follow others?

Knowing that the United Nations only cares about implementing its resolutions related to the Yemeni crisis, which are resolutions, as we know, that always emphasize the unity of Yemen in any form of unity and at the expense of which party?.