The specialized criminal court in Hadramout issued a number of criminal rulings at its public session headed by Judge Fahd Muhammad Al -Yazidi, President of the Court, and in the presence of a member of the prosecution Judge Samir Ali Abdo and in the presence of Secretary Abdullah Basilum in the Green Criminal Case No. (23) of 1445 AH from the Criminal Public Prosecution regarding the charge of intentional murder and incitement

The verdict of the ruling was spent:

First: Accepting payment in form and rejecting it as a subject.

Second: The conviction of the defendants is the first accused (Waddah Amer Ali Saeed Al -Nahdi) and the second suspect (Ibrahim Ali Salem bin Hawail) with what is attributed to them in the accusation decision.

Third: Punish the first convict by the death penalty and reinforcement of bullets to death, and punishing the second convict with a ten -year prison sentence starting from the date of his arrest.

Fourth: The confiscation of seizures in favor of the public treasury.

Fifth: Download those convicted of solidarity, expenses and losers of litigation, a cash amount and the capacity of ten million Yemeni riyals, hand over the heirs of the victim (Saleh Muhammad Salam bin Ishaq).

Sixth: The reasons for this ruling are an integral part of spoken.

The court also issued its primary ruling in the criminal case No. (53) of 1446 AH regarding the charge of participating in an armed gang, which was spent on the following:

First: The conviction of the defendants is the first accused (p

Second: Punishment of those convicted of imprisonment for a year suspended.

Third: Obliging the convicts to pledge and provide a capable sponsor to pay a cash amount and the capacity of twenty million Yemeni riyals, according to what his statement came in the reasons.

Fourth: Responding to the personal seizures of the case.

The court also issued its primary ruling in the criminal case No. (74) for the year 1446 AH on charges of participating in an armed gang, which spent spoken of the following:

First: The conviction of the accused (S.W.M.) with what is attributed to him in the accusation decision.

Second: Suffice the period spent by the convict in the reserve prison.

Third: Obliging the convict to pledge and provide a capable sponsor according to what his statement came in the reasons.

Fourth: The confiscation of the made phone and the rest of the personal seizures.

The court also issued its elementary ruling in the criminal case No. (31) for the year 1446 AH regarding the charge of possession of weapons and explosives, which was spent therefore:

First: The conviction of the accused (SSNS) with what is attributed to him in the accusation decision.

Second: Punishment of the convict in prison for a year, with a suspension of execution, with his obligation to pay his penalty amount and the capacity of ten thousand Yemeni riyals.

Third: The confiscation of seizures in favor of the public treasury.