Based on the decision of the Public Funds Court, the Acting Deputy Public Funds Prosecutor of the Second Instance, specializing in corruption cases, Judge Maher Hitler Muhammad Saif, charged Hassan Al-Haid and others with seizing public funds represented by the lands of the free zone in the capital, Aden, in a judicial announcement published in the October 14 newspaper. Official.

The case of the trials directed against Hassan Ahmed Al-Haid, who is still holding his position, despite his change, and charges of seizing the lands of the free zone, raised questions about the seriousness of anti-corruption efforts in the country, at a time when he is facing serious accusations of seizing money. General, continues to manage the affairs of the free zone. This situation has raised the ire of public opinion, which sees it as a clear sign of weak institutions and conflicts of interest.

The case of Hassan Ahmed Al-Haid highlights a legal loophole or perhaps an administrative negligence that allows an accused of committing serious financial crimes to continue in his position. This incident raises questions about the laws and regulations governing the dismissal of employees involved in corruption cases, and calls for the necessity of reconsidering these legislations to fill the gap. The loopholes in it.