Written by: Saleh Ali Al-Dawil Baras

Negative neutrality policy

         Machiavelli

What Al-Houthi is doing in the Red Sea is part of an Iranian regional project, and his victory means Iran’s control of the Red Sea through a Yemeni tool that Washington was exploiting to blackmail the Gulf states. Locally, his goal is to prove that he is the decision-maker in the north, as he imposes a fait accompli in most of the north, and he wants To prove that the South has the final say on it, taking advantage of its battles in the Red Sea and its ability to paralyze the navigation movement, which it does not want to support Gaza, as it is “reported” in the media. Rather, it wants to prove and extract international recognition that the North and South are under its command, decisions, and influence, and that it can establish mechanisms to untangle each other. The files and that the road map or international initiatives for the solution are merely a result, and his recent attempt to open the Qataba-Dhale road outside the framework of the road map procedures and not linked to them was an intentional maneuver in this direction.

In the summer war of 1994, it was not the Takfir nor the Northern Mobilization Forces that overthrew the South, but its overthrow was part of the end of the Cold War, and getting rid of the South and its army was an international will to get rid of its legacy before anything else. Sana’a, its elites, and its parties exploited it for their own agendas, and at that time Sana’a was “the whole.” In one “and the fatwa was necessary to mobilize the common people, but this time Sana’a is not “all in one,” no matter how they agreed about the south, and the front of the common people in the north has multiple loyalties to forces whose revolt is deep, and what prevents its outburst is that the Houthis are a reality in most of the north.

The policy of self-discrimination may not be in the interest of our cause, and it is part of the war scene. We are not a country that is forced to stay away by its interests. Rather, the South is still an issue that is looking for allies and alliances and must pay a price, because America and Britain will achieve their goals, whether militarily or politically, through the Iranian gate. By giving Iran a piece of the war cake, you will not allow the Red Sea to become an Iranian lake, and if it is done politically with Iran while we are distancing ourselves, the Houthi will be the leader of the north and the south, and this is what Iran wants and desires from the whirlwind of the Red Sea.

In political work, standing is to the extent that it serves the interest, and if this rule is violated, there is no need to stand. Acceptance and random participation will certainly be a loss. However, acceptance requires the political leadership to develop an integrated strategy for military, security, and financial participation, and to find alternatives if the ports and airports are bombed, a strategy in which it is imposed. All its conditions and the required price are determined without delay from London, Washington and others, and it is equipped with strategic weapons that attack the enemy’s ports and airports so that there is an exchange of “equal terror” and it sets alternatives for every possibility. Otherwise, it is an adventure without a price.

March 15, 2024